3 ms·
I'll agree it was unwise. But the person literally clarified the point. Look, it makes me uncomfortable too, but I understand it as a style of speaking and that
by aklemm 9y ago
I'll agree it was unwise. But the person literally clarified the point. Look, it makes me uncomfortable too, but I understand it as a style of speaking and that people get carried away and that non-offensive language sometimes feels ineffectual. Eyes on the ball: fire bigots not people who are a little loose with their language.
- Veelox 9y agoOkay, so what if the "bigots[0]" are not intolerant just a little loose with their language? How do we differentiate the two? [0] a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions. source: https://www.google.com/search?q=bigot https://www.google.com/search?q=bigot
- aklemm 9y agoJust look for tangible damage vs. mere words being exchanged. If I'm intolerant and have a pattern of keeping black people off my team, then I'm in for consequences.
- Veelox 9y agoBut that isn't how tech currently operates. If I have a gay coworker on my team, we get along fine, I have never said an ill word or done an ill deed to them I can still get labeled homophobic for speaking in favor of traditional marriage. I can still be disciplined just for words.
- fjsolwmv 9y agoBigot is now used to mean a generalized term for "someone who stereotypes or discriminates against others"
- muddi900 9y agoConservatives want political correctness to die but not if you are referring to white supremacists.
- fjsolwmv 9y agoRight. Make an ill advised flame comment, get a warning. How is that disproportionate response?