4 ms·
I'm quite confident in this guys approach: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cRlqE3D3RQ&feature=youtu.be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cRlqE3D3RQ&feature=yout
by anotheryou 9y ago
I'm quite confident in this guys approach: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cRlqE3D3RQ&feature=youtu.be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cRlqE3D3RQ&feature=youtu.be
Even if he's wrong, it's super cool to watch his explanation. It's making so much sense.
I doubt any AI can do better then him here, so much vague clues you have to get to the bottom of and loads of slight matches because it's an old language that only has relatives, but no equivalents today.
- fapjacks 9y agoYes! I came here to post this. He builds on work by Stephen Bax widely recognized in the "Voynich community" as being the most insightful. As a trained linguist, this guy does the grunt work to build a model, which he then uses (in his "Voynich update" video) to predict an outcome successfully. That is a huge indicator that he's onto something. What a fascinating series of videos!
- anotheryou 9y agoexactly. Stephen Bax was the most promising before Volder Z took it this step further :) I'm so glad someone finally shares my enthusiasm, I have very high hopes to have a full translation in my lifetime. [SPOILERS:] It sounded like someone just needs to find some old knowledgeable Sinti/Roma.