...or, perhaps, these rifts are merely shouting contests between small (but extremely vocal) groups on extreme opposing ends of the political spectrum, and are

...or, perhaps, these rifts are merely shouting contests between small (but extremely vocal) groups on extreme opposing ends of the political spectrum, and are greatly exaggerated for the usual clickbait / attention economy reasons. ...or, perhaps, it is getting rather contentious, but some as-yet-unknown policy will mitigate these issues, either through honest / open conversation or, conversely, through reasoned limitations on what can and cannot be talked about at the workplace. ...or, perhaps, the benefits of pursuing diversity initiatives continue to be larger than these drawbacks, and in the medium-to-long term they expect this sort of nonsense to die out. (This scenario would imply that their leadership is, in fact, very strong, as it requires a level head to stay the course in the middle of a political / media firestorm when you know that's the right thing to do.) Which of these is true? All? None? I have no idea without further data, but I'd just as soon not prognosticate utter ruin based on sensationalist news articles.