4 ms·
Yawn. Not definitive. Nothing that reading bash(1) wouldn't tell you. And bash(1) at least covers the useful !^ and !$ which this doesn't.
by ralph 19y ago
Yawn. Not definitive. Nothing that reading bash(1) wouldn't tell you. And bash(1) at least covers the useful !^ and !$ which this doesn't.
- pkrumins 19y agoIt doesn't? http://www.catonmat.net/download/bash-history-cheat-sheet.txt http://www.catonmat.net/download/bash-history-cheat-sheet.tx... It does! I couldn't include an example of each word designator combination in the article. That's why I added a cheat sheet listing all of them.
- ralph 19y agoNo, it doesn't. The cheatsheet doesn't allow !^ and !$ to be constructed. The closest would be !!:^ and !!:$.