> where we are able to find a route traversing 734 cities only 7.5% longer than the optimal in less than 25 seconds I could be wrong, but that does not sound l

> where we are able to find a route traversing 734 cities only 7.5% longer than the optimal in less than 25 seconds I could be wrong, but that does not sound like a very good method. But I am all for people writing blog posts and exploring methods in order to learn, of course.