3 ms·
> despite declaring (at the time that Mozilla merged with them) that Pocket would become open source https://github.com/Pocket https://github.com/Pocket
by PurpleRamen 9y ago
> despite declaring (at the time that Mozilla merged with them) that Pocket would become open source
https://github.com/Pocket https://github.com/Pocket
- gtf21 9y agoPocket itself isn't open source, they just have an org on GH which has some tools inside.
- PurpleRamen 9y agoThey started this some weeks ago, and it's supposed to retrieve the missing parts over time. I assume they are just busy checking which parts are legal to open source.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- carussell 9y agoDuckDuckGo has some open source extensions and SDKs to integrate with their service. DuckDuckGo itself, however, is not open source. Do you realize how misleading it would be if someone said this, and then I showed up with a link to their open source extensions, and how misleading it would be to try and appear as if I'm refuting something that I'm not actually refuting? That's exactly what you've done here with regard to my comment about Pocket. There's a reason why nobody else posted the link you did in the 12 hours between my comment and yours, including the dozens of Mozilla/Pocket employees who saw what I wrote. It's because that's not Pocket, and what I wrote about Pocket still not being open source is true.