3 ms·
Pocket really should be optional. This move to monetize that integration suggests to me that Pocket is here to stay.
by colemannugent 9y ago
Pocket really should be optional. This move to monetize that integration suggests to me that Pocket is here to stay.
- m-p-3 9y agoMozilla acquired Pocket last year, so I assume they want to use it as much as they can.
- asddddd 9y agoextensions.pocket.enabled=false
- msla 9y agoWhich would be the default, if Mozilla cared about users.
- balladeer 9y agoIt would be a fully removable extension if it actually did. Nothing less. Even after Pocket code is open source, if at all - the least I am going to accept from Firefox is: 1. pocket as a fully removable extension 2. turned off by default
- gregknicholson 9y agoI don't understand why Mozilla prioritised integrating and then buying a closed-source alternative to the existing open-source project Wallabag. How does deeply integrating one service provider — making it harder for their competition — promote openness, innovation and opportunity on the web?