3 ms·
No I get the point, but try and build a walking skeleton (ie, skateboard without first starting with the wheels/feet. If you are critical for a moment, you can
by RobertRoberts 9y ago
No I get the point, but try and build a walking skeleton (ie, skateboard without first starting with the wheels/feet.
If you are critical for a moment, you can see these two concepts are not dissimilar. No matter what, you always have to make the smallest part first and add onto it.
Seriously, steps 1-4 building the large car are the exact same steps needed to build the small skateboard.
I think he's really trying to say "lower your requirements to go live", and then from their do incremental improvements. Does that seem like a fair assessment?
- JustSomeNobody 9y ago> Seriously, steps 1-4 building the large car are the exact same steps needed to build the small skateboard. They are, but the scale is vastly different. > I think he's really trying to say "lower your requirements to go live", and then from their do incremental improvements. Does that seem like a fair assessment? Sure.
- shkkmo 9y ago> I think he's really trying to say "lower your requirements to go live", and then from their do incremental improvements. No, what he is saying is get your product working as soon a possible, then incrementally improve the components until you have the functionality to go live. That "go live" point (based on the smiley faces) is either the scooter (no longer unhappy) or the motorcycle (first happy face).