> If what you mean is that two babies have the same amount of money in their bank accounts, then that's what you should say. But wealth isn't an amount in a ba

> If what you mean is that two babies have the same amount of money in their bank accounts, then that's what you should say. But wealth isn't an amount in a bank account? Given the earlier context of this thread, I felt my comment should have been clear enough, but granted textual communication can be difficult (especially for emotional topics where many have their response composed well in advance) and clearly I failed. I tried to clarify it on several other occasions before you commented, so any errors in conveying my original message should have been resolved before you posted yours, no? > Wealth is more than money Money being only a tool of measurement, I think that is a given. But that is like saying that the weather is more than temperature. Sure, but what are we supposed to take from that?