2 ms·
HTML 2.0 was published in 1995. I doubt this behaviour comes purely under html anyway as its only usable from the javascript environment. More likely is a con
by stephenr 9y ago
HTML 2.0 was published in 1995.
I doubt this behaviour comes purely under html anyway as its only usable from the javascript environment.
More likely is a content security policy... oh looke there: https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-csp/#directive-disown-opener https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-csp/#directive-disown-opener
- beaconstudios 9y agoI'm aware of that - the existing HTML versions have been pretty much incremental though. XHTML was a breaking change but more for syntactical reasons. By a "2.x" version I mean a fresh rewrite with no requirements for parity with previous versions, so the lessons of the current engine can be applied in a clean-slate environment.
- stephenr 9y agoi feel like there must be an xkcd that sums up your suggestion...
- illustrioussuit 9y agohttps://xkcd.com/927/ https://xkcd.com/927/ Or mobile: https://m.xkcd.com/927/ https://m.xkcd.com/927/
- beaconstudios 9y agoI'm not sure that applies here but it could definitely suffer from the Second System Effect - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second-system_effect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second-system_effect