2 hours should be enough for you to decide if the game was worth it or not. This seems to be straying off-topic. The question isn't whether it was worth the pr

2 hours should be enough for you to decide if the game was worth it or not. This seems to be straying off-topic. The question isn't whether it was worth the price paid. The question is does it violate consumer protection laws vis-a-vis does it do what they said it would. Sounds reasonable? It does not. Applying a uniform hard limit to the full range of all possible games seems unreasonable. Practical, but not reasonable.