3 ms·

I thought they handled 1) by acknowledging that paying for "faster" service was really just paying for the service they used to get by default. They weren't rea

I thought they handled 1) by acknowledging that paying for "faster" service was really just paying for the service they used to get by default. They weren't really creating a fast lane as much as artificially slowing down the normal lane, which is I think an apt analogy. As for 3, that seems kind of a stretch. I thought they did a half decent job, I don't think it does more harm than good for sure.

letsgetphysITal 9y ago
> 1) by acknowledging that paying for "faster" service was really just paying for the service they used to get by default. This is what everyone is missing. There is no "fast lane" and we need to stop acknowledging that phrase. There is only "your "the service you currently pay for" and "artificially slowed traffic".