1) Computation isn’t limited to how we have developed computing so far. 2) You’re analyzing someone else’s ‘code’ in the same way an oyster would analyze yours

1) Computation isn’t limited to how we have developed computing so far. 2) You’re analyzing someone else’s ‘code’ in the same way an oyster would analyze yours. I bet there’s bugs all over the place but we call them features. 3) This is silly. I’d even argue we don’t actually understand what it means to be simulated. We understand the symptoms but not the reality. 4) It’s morally repugnant to bully children online, which is a virtual space, so I’m not sure why a simulation would affect morality. 5) I bet you believe a bunch of other wrong stuff. I don’t think you can consistently be in either camp as much as oysters can debate tabs vs spaces. Full disclosure: AP is my brother. This is a long running argument. I am right. Beep beep beep nothing is real.