3 ms·
...like the irresponsibly risky gamble of not changing. (Innovator's Dilemma) But yes, in many ways it is less risky for a big company to try to acquire succes
by kbutler 9y ago
...like the irresponsibly risky gamble of not changing. (Innovator's Dilemma)
But yes, in many ways it is less risky for a big company to try to acquire successful innovative small companies rather than trying to do the innovation in-house. But they criticized for that, too.
- natbobc 9y agoI think there's 2 primary motivations for acquisition; 1. purchase for innovation. 2. market control. I think the latter is what people squawk about the most. Employees of the acquired will always find it uncomfortable. Small companies often have limited process where larger companies generally need it to function. That being said I don't think larger companies cull/assess the impact/efficiency of their processes on a regular basis.