3 ms·
A possible contributing factor just popped into my head, and only applies to a small subset of the tech industry. I know from experience that big tech companies
by korch 16y ago
A possible contributing factor just popped into my head, and only applies to a small subset of the tech industry. I know from experience that big tech companies like Microsoft, Amazon, and undoubtedly many others, all have significant numbers of workers who are non-exempt contractors(i.e. not direct employees). I don't know how much labor laws vary from state to state, but in WA they are legally bared from employing these special contractors for longer than 11 months. After 11 months they have to convert them to direct employees. So in order to shirk the law and evade paying equal benefits, salaries, options, and corporate taxes, these companies dismiss those contractors for 30 days, then re-hire them. At least in Washington state, this is a standard practice for the past decade or so. There are many loop holes and exceptions, so I'm not even sure of the extent to which this contractor law is applicable.
At Microsoft or Amazon, at least a few years ago when I saw the HR numbers, at any given time, ~20% of the total pool of workers can be temp contractors, so that is a sizable numbers of workers coming and going each December, at least on paper, even if those workers stay on as contractors for many years. (As an aside, I've always wondered why this doesn't generate the same amount of bad PR as the entire video game industry, especially the "EA slave-ship").
I don't have nearly as much direct experience outside of the software industry, but I imagine other industries are doing likewise and on a far broader scale.
Extending this employment pattern to the whole economy, it might explain a big percentage of these mysterious to pin-down "seasonal workers." Or perhaps the labor statistics are just being fudged across the board(thanks US BLS!), from the top down, to try to keep a lid on the worsening unemployment and underemployment situation. I suspect it's a lot of both.
Since the 70's America has been hemorrhaging "real jobs"—i.e. non-service-sector jobs that actually pay an inflation adjusted living wage. Those of us fortunate enough to win the career lottery by going into tech have been quite shielded from the backdrop of the economic decline, and the mass exporting of (manufacturing mostly?) jobs to overseas.
- yummyfajitas 16y agoWhy do you believe service sector jobs are not "real jobs"?
- korch 16y agoBecause they pay under $20/hr, offer no health insurance, dental, no vacation, termination at will, and little possibility for promotion or advancement of skills. That and the balance of power is entirely skewed towards some MBA in a monkey-suit sitting in a corp HQ palace hundreds or thousands of miles away, who only looks at numbers on a spreadsheet or pretty pictures on a powerpoint that represent the lives of human beings. It's not only coders who should never be called "resources"—the same basic decency applies to all humans.
- ryanwaggoner 16y agoBecause they pay under $20/hr, offer no health insurance, dental, no vacation, termination at will, and little possibility for promotion or advancement of skills. Half of this is mostly true, the other half is mostly not true. Tons of major companies in the service sector offer their employees (even their part-time employees) health, dental, and vacation. And employment should pretty much always be termination at will, unless the employee is under a contract and can't leave whenever they want, or is fired due to a protected class, whistleblowing, etc.
- Terretta 16y agoThat "should" is definitely debatable, and mostly culturally informed rather than reasoned. Balance of power and marginal impact of a termination is skewed against the individual.
- ryanwaggoner 16y ago(As an aside, I've always wondered why this doesn't generate the same amount of bad PR as the entire video game industry, especially the "EA slave-ship"). I can't speak for everyone, but I know plenty of contractors (myself included) who have absolutely no interest in FTE with a company. I make much better money and have a lot more flexibility as a contractor / consultant than I ever would as an employee.