> In that case Apple is still free to just buy a few percent of the chips they need from a different supplier, If supplier only needed few % sales from Apple,

> In that case Apple is still free to just buy a few percent of the chips they need from a different supplier, If supplier only needed few % sales from Apple, then Apple could have just given them money for other reasons (funding etc). Thus no loss of choice for consumers. This case is simply money grab. If those % of sales are not enough, then supplier dies. Loss of choice but now due to legal means.