Part of me wonders why this is even surprising. Aren't the execs the ones with all the control over the power-levers? Why do employees expect to ever get someth

Part of me wonders why this is even surprising. Aren't the execs the ones with all the control over the power-levers? Why do employees expect to ever get something in situations like this? (I'm trying to look at this from an outsiders perspective.) What levers can employees even affect to shift the balance of influence in their favour? Coalitions and complaints I guess is the only thing that comes to mind. So in a sense, this article is not really a neutral reporting of the facts. In a sense, the article is one of a fairly limited set of tools that underdogs can use to shift the balance of power more in their favour.