5 ms·

Google Acquires Like.com

60 points by sajithw 16y ago

jsz0 16y ago
If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again. Alternatively get rid of the competition so they can't surprise you by succeeding. If they succeed to much they might just turn down your offers to buy them later and suddenly you've got to play catch-up.
- nanairo 16y ago
  Isn't that what happened with FB?
  - jsz0 16y ago
    Pretty much. Twitter too if you believe those rumors from a couple of years ago. I'm just very skeptical of big companies buying little ones.
keyle 16y ago
With such technologies, it'd be fun to see a face recognition pattern which finds people with similar faces on facebook :) I remember some experiment where they merged hundreds of photos of people from the same country and you could see the emerging patterns of big heads, big noses countries, etc. Fascinating. As to why google would buy like.com, no idea!
- mkramlich 16y ago
  facial recognition search: it's so when everybody changes their name per Eric Schmidt's recommendation, Google can still find you :)
bl4k 16y ago
For a company with $50M in revenue and $50M raised in venture funding, $100M is not a very big acquisition. It is interesting that despite the big revenue figures, it is never mentioned if Like.com is profitable - so we can only assume that it isn't and this acquisition is another asset sale. Google offered them $30-40M before they launched in '05. They should have taken that. Back then Munjal (the CEO) was writing an interesting blog about starting Riya - worth reading the old posts: http://munjal.typepad.com/ http://munjal.typepad.com/
- patio11 16y ago
  Any sale of a search engine to Google is an asset/talent sale, right? They're not going to operate a competing search engine brand (aside from that one they do user testing at) -- they're going to assimilate its technological and biological distinctiveness into their own. Google has 23 billion a year in revenue, substantially all of it from two products. Operating an internal competitor to Product #1 will not move the needle. Its, quite literally, less likely to make them less money than changing the shade of blue they use.
sushi 16y ago
I am certain something is brewing inside Google behind the purchase of like.com They also invested in the company called http://www.pixazza.com http://www.pixazza.com which is doing something on the same lines. Basically trying to monetize the images on web. Maybe Google is planning to incorporate the various bits and pieces of facial or image recognition in order to monetize it.
- joshu 16y ago
  Google ventures != google.
deleted 16y ago
[deleted]
maxklein 16y ago
Are you sure this is not about the facebook 'like' concept? Facebook has brought the 'like' keyword into the mainstream, and the 'like' concept is creating a graph over the entire web that is basically sorting the web by how many people actively like the pages. Perhaps google sees that this approach is basically like their page-rank, but more exclusive and less spammable. Since this 'like' concept was quickly understood by people on facebook, owning the key 'like' domain means that google is poised to exploit the understanding of 'like'. Additionally, it gains all the search knowledge and skills of the people behind the like.com website. This facebook social graph thing with 'liking' websites may be important.
- nostromo 16y ago
  Interesting comment. If facebook's "like" was to replace PageRank they would have to have buttons on a whole lot more pages (Google said a while back they consider one trillion URLs in their index). Especially sites like Wikipedia and Craigslist -- which seem unlikely to ever use facebook widgets. Do you ever think "liking" could realistically replace Google's crawler approach?
  - relix 16y ago
    It could not. "liking" is inherently biased. It is in no way an objective measurement of usefulness. Pages that contain negative content will never be "liked" even though they might be very useful or linked to a lot. As an extreme example, say a mass-murderer becomes very famous. No one (except for a trolling few) will "like" a page giving information about him, like on wikipedia. But this page would be a lot more interesting than a sensationalist article describing him as the second and third coming of Satan, which would be "liked" a lot more, without really being more valuable.
- deleted 16y ago
  [deleted]
- mkramlich 16y ago
  my guess is it's the domain Like.com plus their particular image search & tagging/semantic work plus possibly talent plus eliminating competitor plus denying it as acquisition by another competitor, plus eyeball stream. okay that's not a specific guess at all!
dgregd 16y ago
So Android will have a new feature. You take a picture of a restaurant or something else and then see search results for that object. Including reviews, prices in other shops.
- sandipc 16y ago
  sounds like a more mature version of Google Goggles
nickpatrick 16y ago
To compete with Bing's visual search, perhaps? http://www.bing.com/visualsearch http://www.bing.com/visualsearch Also, the domain is a nice bonus. The future of search lies in recommendation and personalization, and Google will eventually want to build a brand to compete with Facebook in that space.
angelika2010 16y ago
Valuable information and excellent design you got here! I would like to thank you for sharing your thoughts and time into the stuff you post!! Thumbs up! Big thanks for the useful info http://www.buycarinsonline.com/ http://www.buycarinsonline.com/

60 points by sajithw 16y ago

jsz0 16y ago

If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again. Alternatively get rid of the competition so they can't surprise you by succeeding. If they succeed to much they might just turn down your offers to buy them later and suddenly you've got to play catch-up.

nanairo 16y ago
Isn't that what happened with FB?
- jsz0 16y ago
  Pretty much. Twitter too if you believe those rumors from a couple of years ago. I'm just very skeptical of big companies buying little ones.

keyle 16y ago

With such technologies, it'd be fun to see a face recognition pattern which finds people with similar faces on facebook :) I remember some experiment where they merged hundreds of photos of people from the same country and you could see the emerging patterns of big heads, big noses countries, etc. Fascinating. As to why google would buy like.com, no idea!

mkramlich 16y ago
facial recognition search: it's so when everybody changes their name per Eric Schmidt's recommendation, Google can still find you :)

bl4k 16y ago

For a company with $50M in revenue and $50M raised in venture funding, $100M is not a very big acquisition. It is interesting that despite the big revenue figures, it is never mentioned if Like.com is profitable - so we can only assume that it isn't and this acquisition is another asset sale. Google offered them $30-40M before they launched in '05. They should have taken that. Back then Munjal (the CEO) was writing an interesting blog about starting Riya - worth reading the old posts: http://munjal.typepad.com/ http://munjal.typepad.com/

patio11 16y ago
Any sale of a search engine to Google is an asset/talent sale, right? They're not going to operate a competing search engine brand (aside from that one they do user testing at) -- they're going to assimilate its technological and biological distinctiveness into their own. Google has 23 billion a year in revenue, substantially all of it from two products. Operating an internal competitor to Product #1 will not move the needle. Its, quite literally, less likely to make them less money than changing the shade of blue they use.

sushi 16y ago

I am certain something is brewing inside Google behind the purchase of like.com They also invested in the company called http://www.pixazza.com http://www.pixazza.com which is doing something on the same lines. Basically trying to monetize the images on web. Maybe Google is planning to incorporate the various bits and pieces of facial or image recognition in order to monetize it.

joshu 16y ago
Google ventures != google.

deleted 16y ago

[deleted]

maxklein 16y ago

Are you sure this is not about the facebook 'like' concept? Facebook has brought the 'like' keyword into the mainstream, and the 'like' concept is creating a graph over the entire web that is basically sorting the web by how many people actively like the pages. Perhaps google sees that this approach is basically like their page-rank, but more exclusive and less spammable. Since this 'like' concept was quickly understood by people on facebook, owning the key 'like' domain means that google is poised to exploit the understanding of 'like'. Additionally, it gains all the search knowledge and skills of the people behind the like.com website. This facebook social graph thing with 'liking' websites may be important.

nostromo 16y ago
Interesting comment. If facebook's "like" was to replace PageRank they would have to have buttons on a whole lot more pages (Google said a while back they consider one trillion URLs in their index). Especially sites like Wikipedia and Craigslist -- which seem unlikely to ever use facebook widgets. Do you ever think "liking" could realistically replace Google's crawler approach?
- relix 16y ago
  It could not. "liking" is inherently biased. It is in no way an objective measurement of usefulness. Pages that contain negative content will never be "liked" even though they might be very useful or linked to a lot. As an extreme example, say a mass-murderer becomes very famous. No one (except for a trolling few) will "like" a page giving information about him, like on wikipedia. But this page would be a lot more interesting than a sensationalist article describing him as the second and third coming of Satan, which would be "liked" a lot more, without really being more valuable.
deleted 16y ago
[deleted]
mkramlich 16y ago
my guess is it's the domain Like.com plus their particular image search & tagging/semantic work plus possibly talent plus eliminating competitor plus denying it as acquisition by another competitor, plus eyeball stream. okay that's not a specific guess at all!

dgregd 16y ago

So Android will have a new feature. You take a picture of a restaurant or something else and then see search results for that object. Including reviews, prices in other shops.

sandipc 16y ago
sounds like a more mature version of Google Goggles

nickpatrick 16y ago

To compete with Bing's visual search, perhaps? http://www.bing.com/visualsearch http://www.bing.com/visualsearch Also, the domain is a nice bonus. The future of search lies in recommendation and personalization, and Google will eventually want to build a brand to compete with Facebook in that space.

angelika2010 16y ago

Valuable information and excellent design you got here! I would like to thank you for sharing your thoughts and time into the stuff you post!! Thumbs up! Big thanks for the useful info http://www.buycarinsonline.com/ http://www.buycarinsonline.com/