4 ms·
Right, that was my suspicion hence my uncertain language about it. Related to that is my praise of California. It's more mockery than anything. Our state does
by zpallin 9y ago
Right, that was my suspicion hence my uncertain language about it.
Related to that is my praise of California. It's more mockery than anything. Our state does not know how to write concise legislation. ;)
- jtmcmc 9y agoWeiner's legislation is pretty concise. Check out one of his latest housing bills for instance - https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB827 https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtm...
- zpallin 9y agoIncidentally, this is exactly the bill that https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=dragonwriter https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=dragonwriter and I were talking about. Once again, dragonwriter's comment is that this bill "does nothing", and I joked about it being concise, because that is rare in California politics. Sorry I had to explain this to you since you seemed to have missed it, but I couldn't leave you in the dark. Edit: Apparently I have it wrong, this is not the same bill. Multiple tabs open :/
- dragonwriter 9y agoNo, GP is pointing to a housing bill that preempts local zoning restrictions in certain cases, not the “stating future intent to adopt legislation and use existing regulatory powers” net neutrality bill.
- zpallin 9y agoAh thanks.