3 ms·
> There's no reason insurance companies need to be involved in health care at all. There are a very many good reasons to have insurance for health care expense
by zaroth 9y ago
> There's no reason insurance companies need to be involved in health care at all.
There are a very many good reasons to have insurance for health care expenses, in fact they are the perfect example of where insuring for the average cost helps those who see orders of magnitude larger costs due to black swan events that would otherwise ruin them. Another interesting stat showing how important health insurance is; 5% of policyholders are responsible for 95% of total costs.
Now you can argue that you think a national, government run, single payer insurance company would be more efficient, or more fair, or result in better health outcomes, or... but that’s an argument for a different kind of insurance company. It doesn’t change the fact that there is an insurance company very directly and intimately involved in your health care.
- shkkmo 9y ago> Now you can argue that you think a national, government run, single payer insurance company would be more efficient, or more fair, or result in better health outcomes, or... but that’s an argument for a different kind of insurance company. Anybody arguing for that as an alternative to our current system is... uninformed. We already have it, and we spend more per capital on (non-universal) public healthcare via that government run insurance than many countries with public universal health care (including Canada, and the UK). Obviously it is not our lack of "publicly run health insurance" that is the problem here.