4 ms·
I of course agree. But this isn't a serious argument against banning them. With a ban, there are legal routes that people can take to sue their governments to
by beebmam 9y ago
I of course agree. But this isn't a serious argument against banning them.
With a ban, there are legal routes that people can take to sue their governments to enforce the law.
Unless you mean to imply the ban will be completely ineffective. I think that would be absurd thing to argue, as there are an uncountable number of instances where laws have been effective.
- XR0CSWV3h3kZWg 9y agoWhen it comes to Nuclear weapons we do see a ban, but only on new countries gaining them. This international ban has been effective when it came to Iran, but ineffective when it came to North Korea.
- beebmam 9y agoPlease refer to the link I posted. It's an actual international ban for all nations that sign it. Not the NNPT.