6 ms·
Best estimates are that there are about one million holders of Bitcoin; 47 individuals hold about 30 percent, another 900 hold a further 20 percent, the
by 0wing 9y ago
Best estimates are that there are about one million
holders of Bitcoin; 47 individuals hold about 30 percent,
another 900 hold a further 20 percent, the next 10,000
about 25% and another million about 20%, with 5% being
lost. So 1/10th of one percent represent about half the
holdings of Bitcoin and 1 percent close to 80 percent
(http://www.businessinsider.com/927-people-own-half-
of-the-bitcoins-2013-12). The concentration of Litecoin
ownership is similar
(http://litecoin-rich-list.blogspot.com).
Most of the big wallets have been in place from early on,
so sitting back and watching your capital grow has been a
very successful strategy.
The distribution of Bitcoin holdings looks much like the
distribution of wealth in North Korea and makes the
China’s and even the US’ wealth distribution look like
that of a workers’ paradise [1]
Both Bitcoin and Ethereum mining are very centralized,
with the top four miners in Bitcoin and the top three
miners in Ethereum controlling more than 50% of the hash rate. [2]
Even taking a conservative skewed estimate [3] of wealth distribution in Bitcoin, it's about twice as worse than normal capital oligarchy. This is because PoW* style cryptocoins allow anyone with capital to proportionally extract the limited supply of Bitcoins/Cryptocoins/Altcoins/Tokens/Etc - but often significantly worse due to how Satoshi style PoW algorithms produce the majority of the supply in a short time frame. Worse yet are the premined networks, like Ripple, NEM, ERC20 Tokens, NEO, Ethereum, and so on.
[1] http://www.businessinsider.com/bitcoin-inequality-2014-1 http://www.businessinsider.com/bitcoin-inequality-2014-1
[2] http://hackingdistributed.com/2018/01/15/decentralization-bitcoin-ethereum/ http://hackingdistributed.com/2018/01/15/decentralization-bi...
[3] https://medium.com/@BambouClub/are-you-in-the-bitcoin-1-a-new-model-of-the-distribution-of-bitcoin-wealth-6adb0d4a6a95 https://medium.com/@BambouClub/are-you-in-the-bitcoin-1-a-ne...
* Proof of Stake will exacerbate wealth centralization, due to statistical probability of block rewards going to the wealthiest, perpetually increasing their odds of further newly minted coins.
- nrhk 9y agoThat's why I love Raiblocks, decentralized, distributed to third world countries initially, no marketing, feeless, fast. It most likely has the lowest gini coefficient of any coin in the top 100.
- 0wing 9y agoThe first result of a search reveals a bot to automate Raiblock captcha style PoW. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3YR8eebMTF0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3YR8eebMTF0 8,254 views It sounds like Raiblock production/minting/distribution is finalized? How could you measure the Gini coefficient of Raiblocks, how do we know it's not worse especially considering even smaller window of time where people were allowed to participate in the minting and distribution of the supply?
- nrhk 9y agoI would take a look at the distribution in the top 10k wallets for Raiblocks versus other crypto to get this data. Mine is anecdotal, but I always take a look at this distribution when investing in a new coin and was surprised to find my small investment was on the list. I believe they changed the captcha as well during this phase to prevent automation. It was a big source of annoyance for people without time lol.
- 0wing 9y agoOne person can control many addresses. If the supply is produced in a limited time frame, then the limited amount of people who had accesses to production will control the supply.