A company that develops a blockchain-based product/service is not necessarily an ICO company officially for administrative and legal reasons. For example, in th

A company that develops a blockchain-based product/service is not necessarily an ICO company officially for administrative and legal reasons. For example, in the USA, company A can release a product B via ICO. The product has an ICO structure, but company A is legally a "corporation" with shareholders, doing business as usual. Looking at the issue that way, developers will receive their shares/options as it has been done in the past. Hope this makes sense. Note: This is definitely not the only way companies are structured.