> You’d think the value of art would depend on its aesthetic value. This is just plain wrong. Not only does the author not understand art at all, but he also d

> You’d think the value of art would depend on its aesthetic value. This is just plain wrong. Not only does the author not understand art at all, but he also doesn't understand basic collecting. Following that judgment, people collecting post stamps are just morons, cause a stamp that's been used can't be used again and so has 0 value - except perhaps its aesthetic one, which is not huge...