2 ms·
I wonder what the p value is. 9% vs 3% in a sample of 300 doesn’t sound that compelling.
by mrfusion 9y ago
I wonder what the p value is. 9% vs 3% in a sample of 300 doesn’t sound that compelling.
- arkades 9y agoI couldn’t find 9 vs 3 in any of their published papers. Their most recent has 6 v 1.5 (p of .04) from a review of existing epi data, and not an original collection (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412017312345 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016041201...)
- eutectic 9y agoabout .025: http://www.socscistatistics.com/tests/ztest/Default2.aspx http://www.socscistatistics.com/tests/ztest/Default2.aspx
- itronitron 9y agoYeah, it would be interesting to do the same study in California and see if the percentage was higher or lower, they could even break it down by closest major city, San Diego, Los Angeles, San Francisco, etc.
- sshumaker 9y agoExactly my thinking. It's 0.0256 using a chi-squared test, which is definitely below the standard threshold.