4 ms·
1. It shouldn't. 2. Other Manufacturers provide it for free. To the consumer, it is as if Verizon were to start charging extra annual fees to access YouTube c
by jachee 9y ago
1. It shouldn't.
2. Other Manufacturers provide it for free.
To the consumer, it is as if Verizon were to start charging extra annual fees to access YouTube content while Comcast, AT&T and every other ISP don't.
- EpicEng 9y agoOh, "other manufacturers" you say? So you mean, the market is competitive and I have a choice? That, among the other reasons listed, is why it's nothing like net neutrality. Also, your #1 is an opinion.