3 ms·
1. It carries a cost before, just the way it's charged had changed 2. It's not free
by muro 9y ago
1. It carries a cost before, just the way it's charged had changed
2. It's not free
- jachee 9y ago1. It shouldn't. 2. Other Manufacturers provide it for free. To the consumer, it is as if Verizon were to start charging extra annual fees to access YouTube content while Comcast, AT&T and every other ISP don't.
- EpicEng 9y agoOh, "other manufacturers" you say? So you mean, the market is competitive and I have a choice? That, among the other reasons listed, is why it's nothing like net neutrality. Also, your #1 is an opinion.