2 ms·
That's a very sad & true fact. I had a family dinner at a one Michelin star restaurant, and while everything was really good, I have a hard time recognising wha
by titanix2 9y ago
That's a very sad & true fact. I had a family dinner at a one Michelin star restaurant, and while everything was really good, I have a hard time recognising what I ate as a meal because of the quantity. The basic point of a meal is to be satiated, so I don't see the point of eating (very) good stuff for that price if I need to eat something else two hours after.
- ryanwaggoner 9y agoIt probably depends on the restaurant and the person. I’m nearly two hundred pounds and active and I’ve eaten at a half dozen Michelin 3-stars, with meals usually lasting 3-4 hours. Never left feeling hungry.
- baby 9y agoFor me it's not about leaving hungry, but more about having an actual taste of the food you're eating. For example I've eaten at 42 grams which was a fantastic 2-star in Chicago but I can't really remember any dish as they were just a few bites each. On the other hand Anglo in London is still a tasting menu but each dish is larger which let you appreciate what you're eating more.
- Fnoord 9y agoIn stark contrast with all you can eat restaurants