4 ms·
(i) I think as pointed out in the last paragraph, the state is as guilty as Amazon in letting something like this happen. If Amazon would not bring workers to t
by ersiees 9y ago
(i) I think as pointed out in the last paragraph, the state is as guilty as Amazon in letting something like this happen. If Amazon would not bring workers to the legal/market limit. There would be another company to pick at here.
(ii) No corporation cares about being ethical correct. Companies only purpose is to generate (more) profits and this can be even more easily (without moral burdens) achieved if (like in big corporations) there are a lot of layers of abstraction between the decision makers view and the workers view.
(iii) I think if Amazon would be a nice company something like this would not happen.
- tonyedgecombe 9y ago* I think if Amazon would be a nice company something like this would not happen.* Or they would be out competed by another company that isn't so nice.
- jimmywanger 9y ago> the state is as guilty as Amazon in letting something like this happen. Higher wages and regulations mean fewer jobs. With automation the way it is and is progressing, more laws and regulations are counterproductive.
- walshemj 9y agoThat's not what a previous tory chancellor thought he though that subsiding low-quality Mc Jobs with taxpayers money was immoral.
- tonyedgecombe 9y agoWe have had a minimum wage in the UK for a long time now and it hasn't resulted in the increased unemployment many predicted.