3 ms·
Can you explain why there is anything untoward about Parallel Construction? How else are you meant to prosecute cases in court? You need admissable evidence, a
by Chriky 9y ago
Can you explain why there is anything untoward about Parallel Construction?
How else are you meant to prosecute cases in court? You need admissable evidence, and sigint is usually not admissable.
- patrickg_zill 9y agoIt's called fruit of the poisonous tree in legal parlance https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fruit_of_the_poisonous_tree https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fruit_of_the_poisonous_tree
- Chriky 9y agoSigint isn't illegal it's just inadmissible in court
- nyolfen 9y agosigint can be carried out illegally but you have no way of telling what evidence came from illegal surveillance because you don't know what evidence came from sigint to begin with, because it's laundered. you can't challenge illegal practices potentially used to lock you up because they're cloaked in national security.