4 ms·
It's basically advocating a conspiracy theory. "Well, we can't PROVE someone isn't exfiltrating chat logs, therefore slack can't really be secure" What is the
by verylittlemeat 9y ago
It's basically advocating a conspiracy theory.
"Well, we can't PROVE someone isn't exfiltrating chat logs, therefore slack can't really be secure"
What is the value of this statement? How is it an indictment of slack's security?
From the podcast :
"Geoff also concludes that companies should encourage basic security hygiene rather than seek a silver bullet that does not exist."
So despite good law enforcement people get away with crimes. What exactly is the insight there? What is the actionable information for both slack and law enforcement of these "unknown unknowns?"
- hueving 9y agoNo, it's not advocating a conspiracy theory. It's pointing out that you aren't very secure when you are operating in a model where it's even possible to leak all of your client records without even noticing. Compare slack to something with actual end-to-end encryption and you'll start to see the difference.