Quoting a large section of the email verbatim was not a smart move. I'm giving this at least 50% odds of being a leak-tracing exercise. It's common practice to

Quoting a large section of the email verbatim was not a smart move. I'm giving this at least 50% odds of being a leak-tracing exercise. It's common practice to send an oh-so-leakable message like this with per-recipient variations of wording/spaces/non-printable characters, and wait for it to leak so you can identify the leaker. And this email is (a) suspiciously juicy, (b) in reaction to a prominent recent leak, and (c) doesn't actually reveal anything private... (Example from a few years ago: http://gawker.com/5164035/tesla-ceo-in-digital-witch-hunt http://gawker.com/5164035/tesla-ceo-in-digital-witch-hunt)