Something that's been on my mind is the value of code reviews as a line-by-line exercise, vs the value of a code review as a round table. I find line by line r

Something that's been on my mind is the value of code reviews as a line-by-line exercise, vs the value of a code review as a round table. I find line by line reviews useful for small PRs of limited scope (bug fixes, etc), but find it a difficult space to talk about things like approach, architecture, etc. For the latter, I've found round tables where the dev in question have the time and space to explain their reasoning in a synchronous real-time manner to be valuable.