4 ms·
> It’s worth pointing out that Peterson is actually not against using a variety of gender pronouns per se. At some point, what someone literally says they are
by acjohnson55 9y ago
> It’s worth pointing out that Peterson is actually not against using a variety of gender pronouns per se.
At some point, what someone literally says they are or aren't against starts to pale in comparison to the perception of their stance. And if that perception persists, at some point, one has to call into question their sincerity.
- Erik816 9y agoYou are calling someone's sincerity into question because other people have an incorrect perception of what they are saying?
- rosser 9y agoDoes he endeavor in any way to correct this mis-perception or disassociate himself from those who hold it? A lack of condemnation can, not unreasonably, be construed as a tacit endorsement.
- cholantesh 9y agoThat and saying "I'm not ______", and then turning around and saying ______ things is a sign that you're at best lacking in self-awareness and at worst lying.
- stcredzero 9y agoYou are espousing a position that calls for the validation of anyone's unjustified projections onto someone else. Should this cause me to question your sincerity?