3 ms·
And if a human analyst doesn't listen to the full raw original recording, the NSA believes they have never even, legally speaking, 'intercepted' the communicati
by otakucode 9y ago
And if a human analyst doesn't listen to the full raw original recording, the NSA believes they have never even, legally speaking, 'intercepted' the communication. So automated processing is very important. As is training machine learning systems to profile people on arbitrary and unknown criteria for manipulation. All without ever 'intercepting' anything.
- willstrafach 9y ago> And if a human analyst doesn't listen to the full raw original recording, the NSA believes they have never even, legally speaking, 'intercepted' the communication. Curious where you get this from, was it in a different leak? Sounds like an odd loophole if true.
- alew1 9y agoNot sure what his source is, but from the article: Andrew Clement, a computer scientist and expert in surveillance studies, has been mapping the NSA’s warrantless wiretapping activities since before Snowden’s disclosures. He strongly believes the agency would not be restrained in their uses of speaker recognition on U.S. citizens. The agency has often chosen to classify all of the information collected up until the point that a human analyst listens to it or reads it as metadata, he explained. “That’s just a huge loophole,” he said. “It appears that anything they can derive algorithmically from content they would classify simply as metadata.”