3 ms·
Using high Intensity EM Waves to peer under my clothes, invasive pat Downs, Making me remove Clothing, limiting my ability to carry liquids, and about 100 other
by syshum 9y ago
Using high Intensity EM Waves to peer under my clothes, invasive pat Downs, Making me remove Clothing, limiting my ability to carry liquids, and about 100 other policies feels like I am being treated like a Terrorist or Safety Risk or Criminal.
Certainly does not feel like I am treated with Respect, Dignity, and civility that a Free Society should offer its inhabitants as they peacefully travel from point a to point b
I shutter to think what you believe would be unacceptable or "being treated like a terrorist"
>>>> But current screening measures are not unconstitutional.
Only if you skip over and do not read the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 9th , 10th, 14th Amendments, and Article 1 Section 8
- JumpCrisscross 9y ago> high Intensity EM Waves You mean non-ionising radiation?
- syshum 9y agoNot sure why you believe that distinction matters, the fact that is not harmful is irrelevant to my statement. I am more concerned about the Privacy implications, and the precedent it sets than I am health effects The Government going through my underwear drawer does not physically harm me that does not mean I want to consent or be forced to allow them to search it.