4 ms·
This is not as irrational as it sounds. In our own personal lives, we make decisions like this. As an example, I haven't in recent memory visited a ultra-cheap
by startingup 19y ago
This is not as irrational as it sounds. In our own personal lives, we make decisions like this. As an example, I haven't in recent memory visited a ultra-cheap ethnic restaurant (though I go to more expensive places), because I am worried about their health standards. I am using price as a signal of quality - which is reasonable in a perfectly competitive market, but alas, if a lot of people act like me, the "perfectly competitive market" assumption may not hold. In other words, this "price signals quality" thesis itself depends on people evaluating quality first, and then the market sorts itself out based on quality. But if people start acting en masse on the price-signals-quality assumption, it stops signaling quality.
So this is a perpetual tension (or a perpetual self-referential loop!) that means there are going to be overlooked bargains in the market. In case of restaurants, I am just not that motivated to find them.
I can imagine enterprises feeling that way about IT.
- TrevorJ 19y agoI think the biggest dichotomy in outlook occurs when you finally discover or stumble on a tool of great quality which is also either free, or a very good bargain. After that point it becomes worth it, on a personal level to invest time into finding more of those gems. You become a believer in what I like to call the "hidden gems" -a less obvious, and often more elegant solution to a problem. (Be it software, or a life choice, or anything.)