3 ms·
Your original question contained the assumptions that, with an UBI, no services will be created, and no one will be paid for services. None of these are a nece
by TuringTest 9y ago
Your original question contained the assumptions that, with an UBI, no services will be created, and no one will be paid for services.
None of these are a necessary consequence of people receiving an unconditional amount of money regularly. People can still may want to work for luxuries, or I might want to pay others to sway their personal projects in the direction I prefer.
Plus, maybe some services may be "essential" only under the current working scene, but might become less so if everybody adjusted their way of life to a slower rate of consumerism (buying more virtual goods rather than physical, traveling less, working from home, buying local, etc). A lower income level could be sustainable under those conditions, if some percentage of it is guaranteed.