> It would be too easy to split into "alternative facts" if people could successfully establish alternative Wikipedias. Bear in mind that Wikipedia isn't the o

> It would be too easy to split into "alternative facts" if people could successfully establish alternative Wikipedias. Bear in mind that Wikipedia isn't the only website out there! But you make an interesting point about how authoritative it is perceived. > I also think it could benefit from larger number of pages about less important topics, not being that strict on what can and can't be a page topic. Extended Wikipedia of sorts. I agree, that's why I'm doing WikiFork.