2 ms·
Sure, I didn't mean to imply that. I just meant that whatever long term damages are done need to be put on a timescale that actually helps us compare alternativ
by scrollaway 9y ago
Sure, I didn't mean to imply that. I just meant that whatever long term damages are done need to be put on a timescale that actually helps us compare alternatives.
If hundreds of billions of lives are saved in the time it takes for nuclear to do real damage, maybe that's just worth it.
- jerven 9y agoIt is also worth to estimate how quickly nuclear production can scale up and deplace coal. I personally think wind and solar can scale up much faster economically and socially and more easily deplace coal and gas than nuclear could in the best case.