What exactly is better, then? Certainly, the idea that "more powerful and cheaper" is better has its basis in a particular use case as much as "open" does. If y

What exactly is better, then? Certainly, the idea that "more powerful and cheaper" is better has its basis in a particular use case as much as "open" does. If you read the article instead of soapboxing based on the headline you'll find no argument for that open is somehow better, and acknowledges some of the glaring challenges, including cost and that it's not somehow as simple as building software.