2 ms·
Oi. They were not attacking the author. Their conclusion is sound. Given that Webpack is a lot _more_ than just bundling files together (as has been pointed out
by igravious 9y ago
Oi. They were not attacking the author. Their conclusion is sound. Given that Webpack is a lot _more_ than just bundling files together (as has been pointed out twice now) it is incorrect to say that HTTP/2 is a replacement for Webpack. No amount of explaining how HTTP/2 works obviates that fact.
- JimDabell 9y agoThey said they didn't understand Webpack/HTTP2 and misrepresented what they said. Looks like attacking the author to me. > it is incorrect to say that HTTP/2 is a replacement for Webpack. Take a look back over the thread. They didn't say that. They said it was a step in the right direction. Then somebody started putting words in their mouth.