3 ms·
huh? you're missing the point here dude; me and the other guy are just saying that it's a similar situation: > X brought Y together into a nice package that p
by lelbloster 9y ago
huh?
you're missing the point here dude; me and the other guy are just saying that it's a similar situation:
> X brought Y together into a nice package that people could get behind and use even though there wasn't obvious inherent value to those who were using the Z beforehand
that applies to AOL and blockchain.
- CryptoPunk 9y ago"huh" doesn't really tell me anything about your understanding of my point. If you could specify what part of my statement doesn't make sense for you, I could at least try to clarify it. >>X brought Y together into a nice package that people could get behind and use even though there wasn't obvious inherent value to those who were using the Z beforehand If AOL provided a major innovation not available in either X or Y, then it would be analogous to the blockchain. The reason why AOL faded away and the blockchain won't is that the latter solves a major problem that could not be solved by any previous technology, including any of its component technologies alone, while the former did not.