> HN would not allow a post on this topic from an opposing viewpoint to get to the front page. Proof? > Moreover, this particular point of view is from a radi

> HN would not allow a post on this topic from an opposing viewpoint to get to the front page. Proof? > Moreover, this particular point of view is from a radical organization Define "radical." > you can't really have intellectual discourse with people who refuse to see any other position than theirs. How does one tell if this is the case? How does one tell _which_ party refuses to see things from another position? How does one tell if it is in fact miscommunication, or lack of a shared understanding? How does one tell if in fact one of the parties is not discussing in good faith?