4 ms·

The Google Pixel 2 starts at $649. Pixel prices are comparable with iPhones.

urda 9y ago
iPhones and Apple have demonstrated that privacy is a top concern for their users. Google and their Pixel devices, not so much.
- bastijn 9y ago
  Google has much more to gain with mining your data as they have the channels to turn it into profit. Apple has a better chance making profit from their devices than their users data.
  - pfranz 9y ago
    But is that a chicken or the egg? Apple never developed the channels because of their focus on privacy when they could have easily done so.
    - navjack27 9y ago
      That was all under Jobs. How much longer will they keep that position?
      - pfranz 9y ago
        > That was all under Jobs. https://www.apple.com/privacy/ https://www.apple.com/privacy/ wasn't a URL until around 2010. Jobs died in 2011 and back then the page was just a Privacy Policy. Around 2014, they moved their privacy policy page and replaced it with a letter from Tim Cook which puts in writing that they don't monetize user data (if I remember correctly, this was in response to iCloud data breaches). In late 2017 they replaced it again with kind of a product page highlighting privacy. Since Jobs has passed, they've move away from defaulting to a 4-digit code, encrypted phone backups in the cloud, moved from 2-step to 2-factor id, added a secure co-processor (with touch-id), made numerous moves to disable tracking cookies in their browser. From my observations about Apple, if they don't care about something it stagnates or goes away. All of those requires research, put more onus on the user, or cost Apple more per device. Trust is a funny thing and I think it's much easier to lose than to gain. So they could move in another direction in the future, but so far it seems like they're continuing with a focus on user privacy.
- khedoros1 9y ago
  Yes, but the comment you responded to was probably in reference to saying that Pixel devices don't cost much, not about the relative benefits of Apple phones.
nevi-me 9y ago
I think the point being made is that a once-off amount for the hardware might be way less than what they get to make over those 2 years that you use the device (at least in aggregate as not everyone will buy a Pixel)
- Chaebixi 9y ago
  That may be true, but it's also forgetting the fact that the Pixel-owner is a customer, whose needs and wants the product should be catered to. It's sort of like if Google sold a robot that happened to also steal money from your wallet. If they could get away with it, it'd be profitable for them, but there would still be something wrong with their behavior.
- bastijn 9y ago
  Exactly. But only in the case that the vendor already has the channels to turn user data into profit at the scale of Google. Very few other vendors could probably. Mining your input and serving it to millions scales really well. As long as they can do enough to keep the majority of their users happy enough to continue using the product it is most likely more profitable to get the data than sell the devices given the market for android phones and the position they are in.

urda 9y ago

iPhones and Apple have demonstrated that privacy is a top concern for their users. Google and their Pixel devices, not so much.

bastijn 9y ago
Google has much more to gain with mining your data as they have the channels to turn it into profit. Apple has a better chance making profit from their devices than their users data.
- pfranz 9y ago
  But is that a chicken or the egg? Apple never developed the channels because of their focus on privacy when they could have easily done so.
  - navjack27 9y ago
    That was all under Jobs. How much longer will they keep that position?
    - pfranz 9y ago
      > That was all under Jobs. https://www.apple.com/privacy/ https://www.apple.com/privacy/ wasn't a URL until around 2010. Jobs died in 2011 and back then the page was just a Privacy Policy. Around 2014, they moved their privacy policy page and replaced it with a letter from Tim Cook which puts in writing that they don't monetize user data (if I remember correctly, this was in response to iCloud data breaches). In late 2017 they replaced it again with kind of a product page highlighting privacy. Since Jobs has passed, they've move away from defaulting to a 4-digit code, encrypted phone backups in the cloud, moved from 2-step to 2-factor id, added a secure co-processor (with touch-id), made numerous moves to disable tracking cookies in their browser. From my observations about Apple, if they don't care about something it stagnates or goes away. All of those requires research, put more onus on the user, or cost Apple more per device. Trust is a funny thing and I think it's much easier to lose than to gain. So they could move in another direction in the future, but so far it seems like they're continuing with a focus on user privacy.
khedoros1 9y ago
Yes, but the comment you responded to was probably in reference to saying that Pixel devices don't cost much, not about the relative benefits of Apple phones.

nevi-me 9y ago

I think the point being made is that a once-off amount for the hardware might be way less than what they get to make over those 2 years that you use the device (at least in aggregate as not everyone will buy a Pixel)

Chaebixi 9y ago
That may be true, but it's also forgetting the fact that the Pixel-owner is a customer, whose needs and wants the product should be catered to. It's sort of like if Google sold a robot that happened to also steal money from your wallet. If they could get away with it, it'd be profitable for them, but there would still be something wrong with their behavior.
bastijn 9y ago
Exactly. But only in the case that the vendor already has the channels to turn user data into profit at the scale of Google. Very few other vendors could probably. Mining your input and serving it to millions scales really well. As long as they can do enough to keep the majority of their users happy enough to continue using the product it is most likely more profitable to get the data than sell the devices given the market for android phones and the position they are in.