4 ms·
While demand for air travel is growing, the demand is in the wrong places. First of all, you have to remember that on long-haul, the front cabins pay for the f
by ubernostrum 9y ago
While demand for air travel is growing, the demand is in the wrong places.
First of all, you have to remember that on long-haul, the front cabins pay for the flight; if you scale the plane up without also scaling up the number of people buying premium-cabin tickets, you lose money. Emirates runs around 50 premium seats in their 777s, and 60-80 in their A380s depending on configuration. That should tell you something about whether the premium demand scales up with the economy-class demand (it doesn't).
Second, there still just aren't enough places on earth that can fill a 500-seat (or even 600-seat as Emirates is experimenting with on their latest configuration) plane every day. It's a cliché to say it at this point, but: Airbus bet big on people flying mainly between megahubs, and that bet failed. Much of the expansion of commercial flying has been to secondary or tertiary destinations that aren't going to fill an A380-sized plane. Which means either flying the plane with a bunch of empty seats (which loses money) or not flying it every day (which loses money).
You may not like it, but the more reasonably-sized twinjets won. 250-350 seats is the sweet spot, and the future belongs to 777s, 787s, A350s and their descendants.
- CaptainZapp 9y ago"First of all, you have to remember that on long-haul, the front cabins pay for the flight; if you scale the plane up without also scaling up the number of people buying premium-cabin tickets, you lose money." Singapore airlines has a full upper deck business class configuration. More space just means you have more space for business and first class too. "Second, there still just aren't enough places on earth that can fill a 500-seat (or even 600-seat as Emirates is experimenting with on their latest configuration)" While I'd agree that there are not that many business cases for such a huge plane there definitely are. Especially in the case of mega connectors like Emirates. Emirates offers two daily flights from Zurich, which is a European 2nd tier airport with just shy of 30M yearly passengers, while Singapore airlines compressed their two daily flights into one A380 flight a day. "You may not like it, but the more reasonably-sized twinjets won. 250-350 seats is the sweet spot, and the future belongs to 777s, 787s, A350s and their descendants." We'll see when Asian airports (especially in China) run out of runway capacity. There are only so many flights you can dispatch over a runway in any given time.
- ApolloFortyNine 9y agoThe number of flights a well designed airport can handle is insane, and since most airports in China are new, they'll likely avoid this problem for a long time. The problem for awhile was that airports like Heathrow and JFK simply did not have the capability to handle being the major hubs that they were. New hubs, like Atlanta or Dallas Fort Worth, can more than handle their role as a major hub. The answer isn't building bigger planes, but building better airports.
- dx034 9y ago> and 60-80 in their A380s depending on configuration. That should tell you something about whether the premium demand scales up with the economy-class demand (it doesn't). The difference appears to be bigger. Most A380 appear to have 14 first class and 76 business class seats [1], the standard 777-300 config is only 8F42C[2]. That's nearly twice as many premium seats. [1] https://www.flightera.net/planes/A6-EEK https://www.flightera.net/planes/A6-EEK [2] https://www.flightera.net/planes/A6-EGV https://www.flightera.net/planes/A6-EGV
- baud147258 9y agodidn't Airbus took recently a stake in Bombardier for their latest twin-engine plane? So maybe they've came to the same conclusion too.
- gsnedders 9y agoThe C-Series? The largest C-Series, the CS300, is comparable in size to Airbus's smallest model, the A319neo (okay, I think theoretically the A318 is still available, but it's not had a single order in years). This is about wide-body twins taking over from where quad jets (and a few trijets) have traditionally ruled.
- baud147258 9y agoThe CS300 was what I was talking about. And apparently I was wrong, thank you for your correction.
- skgoa 9y agoThe A318 is officially not available anymore. There is no NEO version and they are not even selling the CEO.
- gsnedders 9y agoI knew there was no NEO version, but I hadn't realised they'd stopped selling the CEO (given, AFAIK, they're still taking CEO orders for the other family members).
- skgoa 9y agoThey are selling the last remaining CEO production slots. They are mostly doing it by giving steep discounts on those planes for airlines that buy large numbers of NEOs. However they do not offer the 318ceo as an option to fill those slots, only the 319, 320 and 321.