I appreciate the cross-referencing, as you provided four additional sources for more information. I'm guessing that in this case, however, your phrasing may ha

I appreciate the cross-referencing, as you provided four additional sources for more information. I'm guessing that in this case, however, your phrasing may have come across as dismissive. Its not hard to imagine an overly-critical reader (someone who isn't giving your motives the benefit of the doubt) seeing "This was covered pretty extensively a week ago, although no one commented on it then" and inferring "so why are you posting it again? Here I'll add a bunch of links to prove I'm right." I could be wrong.