https://github.com/das-labor/neopg/blob/master/license.txt https://github.com/das-labor/neopg/blob/master/license.txt It may be opinionated but not well though

https://github.com/das-labor/neopg/blob/master/license.txt https://github.com/das-labor/neopg/blob/master/license.txt It may be opinionated but not well thought of a fork. How is possible to take GPL 3.0 code, say how it is "more restricted", miss to mention the point of what would happen if it is not, and to claim that any additional code to the project shall be licensed under the BSD type of the license. The author has some serious misunderstands about licensing issues.