3 ms·
Our team uses this with great success. To take this a step further we name our features in conjunction with features in our project management tool. git flow fe
by bobbywilson0 16y ago
Our team uses this with great success. To take this a step further we name our features in conjunction with features in our project management tool. git flow feature start visitor_can_sign_in_812381 This gives us a nice mapping of feature branches to actual features. The one thing to be aware of with git flow is that the author is more on the merge side than on the rebase side. So closing features just involves merging on top of the develop branch. This hasn't raised many problems for our team though.
- SkyMarshal 16y agoRegarding rebasing, the first commenter at the bottom of the linked article mentioned he prefers rebasing to merging, and referenced a blog post of his explaining why: http://darwinweb.net/articles/the-case-for-git-rebase http://darwinweb.net/articles/the-case-for-git-rebase Worth reposting here in case anyone missed.