3 ms·
What is old is new again! Whoo-hoo. Regardless it's still not server-less... The entire system is still running off a server...
by anfilt 9y ago
What is old is new again! Whoo-hoo.
Regardless it's still not server-less... The entire system is still running off a server...
- balls187 9y agoWhich you do not manage in any way shape or form, nor do you have the ability to.
- anfilt 9y agoI am not saying any thing is wrong with that. I am saying it still runs on a server... So server-less is a misnomer.
- rmrfrmrf 9y agoAre you familiar with the term “abstraction”?
- cwyers 9y agoDo you think that there are actual daemons in your computer? If you have to kill a process, do you only do so in self-defense?
- anfilt 9y agoVery funny. No, but what if I called a virtual machine CPU-less. Bad name? I would say that is. Also treating long running task as a little demon performing a task is more allegorical same with killing a process. I am not sure I would call it being server-less allegorical.
- eridius 9y agoYou're confusing abstraction with implementation. The architecture is serverless. The implementation is running on a server. But the whole point is the users don't have to worry about the implementation, just the architecture.